Working memory and syllogistic reasoning.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between working memory span and syllogistic reasoning performance. In addition, performance for the reasoning task was compared to predictions made by mental model theory and the probability heuristics model. According to mental model theory, syllogisms that require the use of more mental models are more difficult. According to the probability heuristics model difficulty is related to the number of probabilistic heuristics that must be applied, or (for invalid syllogisms) inconsistencies between the derived and correct conclusion. The predictions of these theories were examined across two experiments. In general, people with larger working memory capacities reasoned better. Also, the responses made by people with larger capacities were more likely to correspond to the predictions made by both mental model theory and the probability heuristics model. Relations between working memory span and performance were also consistent with both theories.
منابع مشابه
Syllogistic reasoning performance in MDMA (Ecstasy) users.
Previous research has demonstrated working memory and executive deficits in recreational users of MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine; Ecstasy). In turn, both of these constructs have been implicated in syllogistic reasoning performance. Twenty-two MDMA users (mean age = 21.36) and 26 MDMA nonuser controls (mean age = 21.31) were tested on syllogisms of varying difficulty and on measures of...
متن کاملIndividual differences in working memory capacity and resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
In two experiments, we investigated the possibility that individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) would provide resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. In Experiment 1 (N = 157), participants showed a belief bias effect in that they had longer response times and decreased accuracy on syllogisms with conflict between the validity and believability of the conclusion tha...
متن کاملCan natural language semantics explain syllogistic reasoning?
It has long been known that conversion of the quantifiers can explain syllogistic reasoning errors (Newstead, 1989; Revlis, 1975; Wilkins, 1928). Geurts is more concerned with explaining how people solve valid syllogisms, and an integral part of his model is the (entirely legal) conversion of ‘no’ and ‘some’. This part of Geurts’ theory seems unexceptionable, but more problematic is his assumpt...
متن کاملProbabilistic representation in syllogistic reasoning: A theory to integrate mental models and heuristics
This paper presents a new theory of syllogistic reasoning. The proposed model assumes there are probabilistic representations of given signature situations. Instead of conducting an exhaustive search, the model constructs an individual-based "logical" mental representation that expresses the most probable state of affairs, and derives a necessary conclusion that is not inconsistent with the mod...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology
دوره 57 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004